An interview is a qualitative research technique used to gather data through direct questioning. This method typically involves an interviewer and one or more interviewees. Various types of interviews exist, each defined by their degree of structure.

  • Structured interviews use a fixed set of questions delivered in a specific sequence.
  • Unstructured interviews are conversational and flexible.
  • Semi-structured interviews blend both approaches. 

Types of Interviews in Research

Interviews are a key research method used in both qualitative research and quantitative research to gather detailed information from participants. The selection of interview type depends on the research question and the overall goals of the research project.

In qualitative research, interviews—often referred to as qualitative interviews—are particularly valuable for exploring in-depth insights. Researchers often conduct interviews to collect nuanced data that other methods may not capture, ensuring the findings align with the objectives of the study. Here are the types of different interviews in research:

Structured Interviews

Structured interviews represent the most formal and standardized type of interview format. In this approach, the researcher follows a predetermined set of questions asked in a specific order. These questions are typically close-ended, meaning they have limited pre-defined response options, such as yes/no or multiple-choice.

The key advantage of structured interviews is their high degree of consistency. By asking each participant the same questions, the researcher can more easily identify patterns, make comparisons, and quantify the results. This makes structured interviews well-suited for large-scale survey research, where the goal is to collect standardized data.

Additionally, the fixed question order and format help mitigate potential interviewer biases, as every participant follows the same procedure. This can enhance the reliability and validity of the findings.

However, this approach’s highly structured nature also has some drawbacks. The rigid format provides little flexibility to explore unexpected avenues or probe deeper into participants’ responses. Structured interviews may also feel overly formal, potentially impacting the participants’ comfort and openness.

Researchers may choose to utilize structured interviews when:

  • They have a strong foundational knowledge of the research topic and can formulate effective, targeted questions in advance.
  • They have limited time or resources, as structured interviews are generally quicker to conduct and analyze than open-ended formats.
  • Their research design requires tightly controlled environmental conditions across participants.

Semi-Structured Interviews

Semi-structured interviews balance the rigid structure of standardized interviews and the open-endedness of unstructured conversations. In this format, the researcher has a prepared interview guide with key questions and topic areas to cover, but the dialogue can flow more organically.

While the researcher maintains some control over the general direction of the interview, they have the flexibility to adapt and probe deeper based on the participant’s responses. This can lead to discovering unexpected insights that may not have emerged in a more tightly scripted interview.

The semi-structured approach provides a helpful middle ground—more consistency and focus than a free-flowing unstructured interview yet more flexibility than a highly standardized questionnaire. This makes semi-structured interviews well-suited for exploratory research, where the goal is to gain a rich, contextual understanding of a phenomenon.

However, the less rigid structure can also present some challenges. It may be more difficult to identify clear patterns or make direct comparisons across participant responses, as the specific questions and flow of the interview can vary. Additionally, the open-ended nature requires more skill and experience from the interviewer to maintain focus and rapport.

Researchers may opt for a semi-structured interview format when:

  • They have a solid foundation in the research topic but want to leave room for unexpected insights to emerge.
  • Their study aims to explore complex, nuanced phenomena where depth of understanding is a priority over standardization.
  • They possess strong interviewing skills and can balance structure and flexibility.

Unstructured Interviews

Unstructured interviews are at the opposite end of the spectrum from structured interviews. This format abandons using a predetermined question guide and adopts a more free-flowing, conversational style. The researcher may have only a broad topic or theme in mind rather than a rigid set of questions to ask.

The hallmark of an unstructured interview is its flexibility. The interviewer can adapt the dialogue based on the participant’s responses, exploring unexpected avenues and probing deeper into areas of interest. This open-ended approach allows collecting rich data to uncover complex, contextual insights.

Unstructured interviews place high trust in the participants, empowering them to guide the discussion in a natural and authentic direction to their experiences and perspectives. This can foster a deeper rapport and openness compared to more structured formats.

However, this flexibility also presents some challenges. Without a standardized question script, it can be more difficult to identify clear patterns or make direct comparisons across participant responses. The lack of structure also requires a high level of skill and experience from the interviewer to keep the conversation focused and productive.

Researchers may opt for an unstructured interview approach when:

  • Their research aims to explore complex, understudied phenomena in an in-depth, exploratory manner.
  • They have a strong foundation in the research topic and feel comfortable navigating open-ended dialogues.
  • Forming a deep, trusting relationship with participants is crucial to uncovering authentic, nuanced insights.

Focus Groups

A focus group is a special type of group interview. It typically involves 6-10 participants who engage in a guided discussion around a specific topic. The session is moderated by a skilled facilitator who introduces discussion prompts and encourages everyone to participate actively.

Focus groups are useful for gaining in-depth, qualitative insights into people’s thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. They work well for exploring new product or service ideas, testing marketing messages, and understanding the motivations behind consumer decisions.

The group dynamic of a focus group can yield data that may not emerge from individual interviews. Participants often build off each other’s ideas, leading to unexpected revelations. However, focus groups also require skillful moderation to ensure all voices are heard, and no single participant dominates the discussion.

Narrative Interviews

A narrative interview is a qualitative research method used primarily in social science to explore participants’ life stories or personal experiences. This common type of interview encourages respondents to share their stories in their own words, allowing for deep insights into their perspectives and how they make sense of their experiences.

Interviews are conducted with minimal interruption, letting the participant guide the conversation. This type of qualitative interview often results in rich, detailed interview data, making it valuable for researchers looking for an in-depth understanding of the subject.

The interview process typically involves open-ended questions that invite the interviewee to narrate significant events, and the research process focuses on analyzing these narratives to uncover broader themes or patterns. Narrative interviews provide the flexibility to explore complex emotional and social contexts.

Ethnographic Interviews

Ethnographic interviews are another qualitative research method commonly used in social science, particularly in anthropology and sociology. These in-depth interviews are conducted within the participant’s natural environment, and they are often part of a broader mixed method approach, combining observations with interviews.

The interview allows researchers to gain a deeper understanding of cultural and social behaviors from the participant’s perspective. Ethnographic interviews provide an immersive experience where the interviewer and participant engage in a more conversational interview process, focusing on real-life contexts.

As part of qualitative methods, these interviews aim to collect contextual, detailed interview data that reflect the day-to-day experiences and social interactions of the participants. The ethnographic research process integrates interviews with observations, making it a robust method for understanding cultural nuances and social dynamics.

Examples of Interview Questions

Here are some sample interview questions for each type of interview approach:

Interview TypeExample Questions
Structured InterviewOn a scale of 1 to 5, how satisfied are you with the customer service you received today?
Did you find the online ordering process easy to use? (Yes/No) 
How often do you visit our website? (Daily/Weekly/Monthly/Rarely)
Semi-structured InterviewIf yes, can you tell me more about one of your hobbies and what you enjoy about it? 
If not, what activities or interests do you wish you had more time for as a student?
Unstructured InterviewCan you walk me through your typical daily routine? 
What led you to choose this career path? 
How would you describe the culture at your workplace?
Focus GroupDescribe your ideal dog breed. What physical and personality traits would you want in a canine companion, and why are those characteristics important to you?

Advantages and Disadvantages of Interviews

Interviews in research offer valuable depth, capturing nuanced responses and nonverbal cues often missed by other methods. Their strength lies in rich data collection and the ability to probe complex topics. However, interviews can be time-consuming and challenging to execute properly. Smaller sample sizes may impact validity, and there’s a risk of interviewer bias influencing results. Despite these limitations, interviews remain a powerful tool for gathering detailed qualitative information judiciously.

Each type of interview approach has its own set of strengths and weaknesses:

Type of interviewAdvantagesDisadvantages
Structured interview• Consistency across interviews
• Easy to compare responses• Time-efficient
• Reduces interviewer bias
• Lack of flexibility
• May miss depth in responses
• Can feel impersonal
Semi-structured interview• Balance of consistency and flexibility
• Allows for deeper insights
• Adaptable to each interviewee
• Builds better rapport
• More time-consuming
• Harder to compare responses
• Requires skilled interviewer
Unstructured interview• Highly flexible
• Allows for in-depth insights
• Natural conversational flow
• Good for exploratory research
• Difficult to compare responses
• Very time-consuming
• Potential for interviewer bias
• Requires highly skilled interviewer
Focus group• Observes group dynamics
• Efficient for multiple perspectives
• Stimulates idea generation
• Good for brainstorming
• Risk of groupthink
• Less individual depth
• Scheduling challenges
• Requires skilled moderator

Steps of Conducting a Research Interview

Conducting a research interview is a crucial part of the research process, especially in qualitative studies. To ensure you gather valuable and reliable data, following a structured approach is essential. Below are the key steps to conducting an effective research interview:

  • Define the Research Objective: Clearly identify the purpose of the interview and the research question you aim to answer
  • Select the Type of Interview: Choose between structured, semi-structured, unstructured, or other types of interviews based on your research goals
  • Design the Interview Guide: Prepare a set of questions or topics to cover during the interview to ensure consistency and guide the conversation
  • Identify and Recruit Participants: Select participants relevant to the research question and invite them to take part in the interview
  • Schedule the Interview: Arrange a convenient time and place for the interview, whether in person, online, or over the phone
  • Prepare for the Interview: Review the interview guide and ensure all necessary tools (e.g., recording devices, consent forms) are ready
  • Obtain Informed Consent: Before the interview starts, explain the purpose of the research, what will be involved, and obtain consent from the participant
  • Conduct the Interview: Follow the interview guide, ask open-ended questions, and let the participant share their thoughts while staying flexible for follow-up questions
  • Record the Interview: Audio or video recording ensures you capture the details accurately for later analysis
  • Thank the Participant: Conclude the interview by expressing appreciation for their time and insights
  • Transcribe and Analyze the Data: After the interview, transcribe the recorded responses and begin analyzing the data to identify patterns or key themes
  • Interpret and Report Findings: Interpret the findings in the context of the research objectives and report them in a research paper, presentation, or publication

Considerations for Interview Research 

When conducting interview research, several critical factors need to be considered to ensure the research process is effective, ethical, and unbiased. Below are some key considerations:

Interviewer Bias

It’s essential to minimize interviewer bias, where the interviewer’s own beliefs or expectations might influence the responses. Neutral questions, open-ended prompts, and a non-judgmental approach help ensure that the data collected is as objective as possible.

Sampling

Choosing the right sampling method is crucial for collecting data from a representative group of participants. Consider whether you need a random sample, purposive sample, or convenience sample based on the research question. Ensure that the sample size is sufficient to draw meaningful conclusions from the data.

Ethics, Consent, and Confidentiality

Always prioritize ethics by obtaining informed consent from participants. Clearly explain the purpose of the research, how the interview data will be used, and ensure confidentiality by protecting personal information. This helps build trust and ensures participants feel comfortable sharing honest responses.

Respecting Boundaries

During the interview, it’s crucial to respect the participant’s boundaries. Avoid pushing for answers if a participant feels uncomfortable with a topic. Ensure they understand they can skip questions or withdraw from the interview at any time without penalty. This creates a respectful and ethical environment for gathering information.